Guess What? “Wednesdays Are For Lovers” Edition

By Jordan Ginsberg • Aug 12th, 2009 • Category: ModBlog


Welcome back, folks, to America’s most influential literary salon, Guess What?, where your dreams have the room to soar as high as possible. This is actually a two-parter—even after the much anticipated click-through above, it’s entirely possible that the full story of just what exactly is going on may still be a mystery. If that’s the case, then perhaps you’ll fancy some context, after ye olde jump. But don’t cheat if you don’t have to! The first person to guess correctly wins A WHEELBARROW FULL OF PUPPIES!*

*Offer not valid.

There it is! For those of you who guessed, “Excellently healing full-length subincision with a piercing at the base of the split,” you win! Congratulations, you lucky devils.

Tattoo Hollywood, BME’s first tattoo convention, is coming to Los Angeles from August 21-23, featuring contests, prizes and some of the best artists from around the world! Click here for more information.

See more in “Full Subincision“ (Subincision & Genital Splitting) (members only)

Tagged as: ,

Jordan Ginsberg is the former managing editor and head writer for BME.
Email this author | All posts by Jordan Ginsberg


Please help support ModBlog by contributing photos to BME or otherwise getting a membership so you can see all the galleries. Thank you!



26 Responses »

  1. Dan on August 12th, 2009 at 5:05 pm:

    That’s…….. Intense!!!! Looks amazing. I admire that kind of commitment.

  2. Petezilla on August 12th, 2009 at 5:47 pm:

    I guessed the piercing…. sorta.
    The subincision was a bolt out of the blue though

  3. Diva on August 12th, 2009 at 6:18 pm:

    Oh man.

    owwww. I thought from the top picture it was a vagina.

  4. nae on August 12th, 2009 at 6:51 pm:

    I was so confused about ‘the botched fourchette piercing’ then clicked the other link and nearly wet myself with excitement. More sub-incisions please!

  5. Kaysha on August 12th, 2009 at 7:01 pm:

    Damn. That’s all I have to say.

  6. Brittney on August 12th, 2009 at 7:08 pm:

    I must say… I was severely confused; then I saw the clickthrough.
    LOL!

  7. BB on August 12th, 2009 at 8:08 pm:

    lol … even if it appears to be a vagina…. ALWAYS winds up being a penis :-P

  8. Myke on August 12th, 2009 at 8:13 pm:

    I went with Vagoo too…

  9. Republik on August 12th, 2009 at 9:15 pm:

    You had me stumped! Once I clicked through, showing the photo to my unmodified boyfriend caused him to make the best confused/frightened face I’ve ever seen in my life. I love you, BME.

  10. h3cknot3kno on August 12th, 2009 at 9:57 pm:

    Well, I was right with the location, surprisingly.
    But the clickthrough was like @___@ wtf?
    Crazy awesome. :D

  11. Celepr0n on August 12th, 2009 at 10:04 pm:

    Very nice sub

  12. kattikins on August 12th, 2009 at 10:06 pm:

    Hott.

  13. NukeX on August 12th, 2009 at 11:19 pm:

    Coulda sworn it was a fourchette that kinda missed its mark, but surprise! It’s a penis! It’s always a penis! Silly me, shoulda known by now! Heheehe.

  14. Ru on August 13th, 2009 at 12:00 am:

    Okay… and the point of posting a horribly pixelated photo of some poor skin was?
    I don’t see the point of even bothering to post the second one.

  15. Ru on August 13th, 2009 at 12:01 am:

    oh. right. my mistake.

  16. HereKittyKitty on August 13th, 2009 at 12:46 am:

    Missed that one. Oh well, I don’t like puppies much anyway.

  17. Lexi on August 13th, 2009 at 1:55 am:

    noticed the man hands in the first click through but figured it was just a boyfriend… helping out? this is too good.

  18. crazzy420 on August 13th, 2009 at 6:00 am:

    i didn’t see that coming….

  19. Dusk on August 13th, 2009 at 6:52 am:

    I don’t know how it can be possible to see a pussy on the 1st photo…! (you need to revise woman’s anatomy, look at more porn, or just have more sex lol). Nice pic ;).

  20. jessFACE on August 13th, 2009 at 8:58 am:

    Yup I thought vajayjay

  21. DS3M on August 13th, 2009 at 9:58 am:

    I was wondering how some could see a vagina. Didn’t seem like that at all.
    And wow…
    Just, wow.

  22. Rhuin on August 13th, 2009 at 11:32 am:

    The sub looks beautiful :)

  23. Linda on August 13th, 2009 at 11:43 am:

    Yeah that top picture doesn’t even remotely look like a vagina…
    Didn’t see the sub coming though (no pun intended)

  24. Spingly on August 13th, 2009 at 1:32 pm:

    thats absolutely gorgeous.
    well done!

  25. Lucas on August 13th, 2009 at 7:52 pm:

    That is one nice sub!!

  26. aLICE on August 14th, 2009 at 12:24 pm:

    Hey, as someone with a vagina, I can tell you
    pull the skin around on the lower part of a vag enough, cover up the right parts, and that could have definitely looked like a vagina.

Leave a Reply